Migrants thought they were in court for a routine hearing. Instead, it was a deportation trap[html]
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents pull a man out of an elevator as he and his daughter attempt to leave following a hearing in immigration court, Friday, Sept. 5, 2025, in New York. (AP Photo/Olga Fedorova)2025-11-19T12:03:26Z
This year, Associated Press reporters observed immigration court proceedings in 21 cities. Hearings repeatedly ended with cases dismissed by the government, allowing agents to arrest immigrants in courthouse hallways. AP reporters also reviewed internal records and spoke to judges, clerks and lawyers for the departments of Justice and Homeland Security to gain insight about the scope of the administration’s effort.
The government lawyer knew what was coming as she stood inside a courtroom and texted an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent waiting in a corridor a few feet away.
“I can’t do this,” the lawyer said in a text message as she looked at her docket of cases. “This is a new emotional load.”
“I understand,” the agent responded. “Hopefully we meet again in a better situation.”
Nearby, a Cuban man who had lived in the United States for years stepped from an elevator and into the courtroom where the government lawyer was waiting for what the man thought was a routine hearing.
The man was doing what the law required, and brought along his wife, a legal resident, and their 7-month-old infant.
Then the lawyer quickly moved to have the man’s asylum claim dismissed and a judge agreed, making the man eligible for “expedited removal.” As he left the courtroom, the man was swarmed by plainclothes immigration agents who had been surveilling him. A struggle ensued and the wife’s shouts could be heard from the hallway as the lawyer moved on to the next case.
The agent replied four minutes later: “Got him.”
Similar scenes of data-gtm-enhancement-style="LinkEnhancementA" href="https://apnews.com/article/immigration-courts-arrests-trump-ice-deportations-fa96435d4ec021cc8ff636b23d80d848">courthouse arrests, part of a makeover of the immigration courts under President Donald Trump, are playing out across the United States as his call for mass deportations of migrants is executed with unusually data-gtm-enhancement-style="LinkEnhancementA" href="https://apnews.com/article/chicago-immigration-federal-arrests-helicopter-trump-ice-8dbf688f78f3b6d1b8fdb989557b28c4">aggressive tactics.
Stay up to date with the news and the best of AP by following our WhatsApp channel.
Follow on
Trump’s pledge during his 2024 campaign, to impose hardline immigration policies was a major reason he won a second term. Now that Americans have seen how the his plan is being implemented, there are signs that many think he has gone too far. About 57% of adults disapprove of Trump’s handling of immigration, according to a survey this month by data-gtm-enhancement-style="LinkEnhancementA" href="https://apnorc.org/projects/trumps-approval-rating-remains-low-during-government-shutdown/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.
Over several months, reporters for The Associated Press observed immigration court proceedings in 21 cities. Hearings repeatedly ended with cases dismissed by the government, allowing plainclothes federal agents to carry out arrests in courthouse hallways in close coordination with attorneys from the Department of Homeland Security.
Screenshots of the text messages were obtained by The Associated Press from a government official who feared reprisal and provided them on condition of anonymity. The messages offer a rare look at how the nation’s 75 immigration courts are churning out rulings in an assembly-line like fashion and how, for many people, the courtrooms have become data-gtm-enhancement-style="LinkEnhancementA" href="https://apnews.com/hub/immigration">deportation traps.
Courthouse arrests coordinated days in advance
In a court system with a backlog of about 3.8 million asylum cases, families have been torn apart and lives upended. Due process seemingly is an afterthought.
“When Americans picture a courtroom, there are a few core expectations” of fairness, dignity and impartiality, said Ashley Tabaddor, a former immigration judge in Los Angeles and past president of the National Association of Immigration Judges.
“That’s what makes a court — not a room with a bench or person with a robe,” she said. “But what we have here is a vision completely turned on its head.”
Over the past nine months, the Trump administration has data-gtm-enhancement-style="LinkEnhancementA" href="https://apnews.com/article/court-judge-immigration-fired-trump-chicago-fe049bf3cc8718545879769476391d11">fired almost 90 immigration judges seen by Trump’s allies as too lenient, directed masked officers to handcuff migrants at closed asylum hearings and sent memos instructing judges to fall into line.
Unlike federal courts, where there are strict rules of procedure and judges have lifetime tenure, the Justice Department runs immigration courts and the attorney general can fire the judges with fewer restraints.
Nine current officials spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation. Most expressed deep misgivings about punishing people who had followed the rules and showed up for court hearings.
“As a government attorney, my duty is to uphold the law and protect the public interest — not to secure removal or detention outcomes by default,” a government lawyer wrote to the American Bar Association seeking professional guidance.
But that is not how cases are often unfolding.
>
data-expand="ReadMore-expand" data-limit="110" data-main->
American Gateways attorney Erika Gonzalez talks with a woman before she attends her court hearing, Wednesday, Sept. 24, 2025, in San Antonio. (AP Photo/Eric Gay)
>
data-main- data-more-id
data-less-id>
American Gateways attorney Erika Gonzalez talks with a woman before she attends her court hearing, Wednesday, Sept. 24, 2025, in San Antonio. (AP Photo/Eric Gay)
data-collapse-element>Share
Share
Courthouse arrests are coordinated days in advance to meet quotas with little regard for the particulars of a case, according to several of the U.S. officials.
According to one official, Homeland Security lawyers note on a spreadsheet which cases are “amenable” to dismissal, allowing an asylum-seeker to be immediately rearrested and placed in expedited removal proceedings. Most of those detained are men without lawyers who entered the U.S. alone and are expected to appear in court in person. Contrary to Trump’s claims that he is targeting the ‘worst of the worst,’ most don’t have a criminal conviction, according to a data-gtm-enhancement-style="LinkEnhancementA" href="https://www.cato.org/blog/65-people-taken-ice-had-no-convictions-93-no-violent-convictions" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Cato Institute analysis of ICE data.
ICE reviews the spreadsheet and selects which people it wants to pursue if cases are dismissed. On the hearing date, federal agents communicate directly with DHS lawyers, who act as prosecutors in immigration courts. The lawyer often provides near verbatim updates of the proceedings over text message to agents waiting outside the courtroom.
“Black shirt? Let me know if the judge dismissed,” an ICE agent texted during one hearing.
Lack of independence limits immigration court’s authority
Almost from the outset, immigration courts were plagued by a lack of resources, authority and judicial independence.
The courts were established in 1952, but it was not until 1973 that “special inquiry officers” were given the “judge” title and allowed to wear judicial robes. The Executive Office for Immigration Review, or EOIR, was created in 1983. But that agency remained a part of the Justice Department, giving the attorney general authority to override decisions.
“We were a legal Cinderella,” said Dana Leigh Marks, who retired as an immigration judge in 2021 after a 34-year career. “No other court in the nation functions like this.”
The first Trump administration undertook a series of changes to reduce the case backlog, including instructing judges to deny entire categories of asylum claims such as for victims of gang or domestic violence.
It also set up a dashboard that would become the bane of many judges: Red, yellow and green gauges measure each judge’s performance on goals ranging from completed cases — a minimum of 700 annually, regardless of complexity — to how many custody cases were decided on their first hearings.
To meet the metrics, judges must race through dockets, sometimes devoting mere minutes to evaluate asylum-seekers’ claims.
“It’s like deciding death penalty cases in a traffic court setting,” Marks said.
Administration refers to immigration judges as ‘inferior officers’
When Trump returned to the White House in January, his allies took direct aim at the court.
Since then, the Justice Department has issued data-gtm-enhancement-style="LinkEnhancementA" href="https://www.justice.gov/eoir/eoir-policy-manual/memoranda-pm-list" target="_blank" rel="noopener">52 policy memos — more than the previous six years combined — making it easier to hire and fire judges and warning against pro-migrant bias.
The memos highlight the courts’ weakened status by referring to judges as “inferior officers” — a rarely used term taken from the Constitution.
In early September, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said he would lend data-gtm-enhancement-style="LinkEnhancementA" href="https://apnews.com/article/immigration-judges-military-lawyers-deportation-9f9d42869469e42240ef0720c25fc681">600 military lawyers to the immigration courts, about equal to the current number of judges. The goal, according to the administration, is to more effectively reduce caseloads by widening the pool of potential judges to include people already steeped in administrative law. But many migrant advocates are concerned the incoming judges lack the necessary experience to decide asylum cases.
“It makes as much sense as having a cardiologist do a hip replacement,” said Ben Johnson, executive director of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.
The administration has pushed back against criticism it is co-opting the courts to accelerate its deportation goals. In a statement, Justice Department spokeswoman Natalie Baldassarre said DHS decides whether to arrest migrants and that most judges consider it an “honor rather than an insult” to be called an inferior officer empowered by the Constitution and serving at the will of the attorney general.
Baldassarre likened a record surge of asylum seekers during the Biden administration to an “improper conspiracy between DHS and the Immigration Courts to effectuate an unlawful amnesty for hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens.” The Justice Department, she said, had “restored the integrity, impartiality, and independence of the Courts.”
DHS did not respond to repeated email and phone requests for comment.
Government attorneys fear harassment, haunted by arrests
For some inside the courts, work has become a stressful, lonesome grind. Fear prevails. Resumes are being updated.
One DHS lawyer described being haunted at night by the sound of jangling shackles of migrants the lawyer helped arrest. The lawyer joined the government after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, believing that protecting America’s borders was a patriotic duty.
The lawyer still cherishes a signed copy of Nobel Prize winner Elie Wiesel’s memoir “Night,” which was handed out at a work seminar. “Think higher, feel deeper,” reads the author’s inscription of the book, which is marked DHS “Training Material.”
Today, its message torments.
“This isn’t what any of us signed up for,” the lawyer said.
After a turbulent summer, the courthouses are starting to look lonely, too. With word spreading that a trap had been laid, many migrants, fearing arrest, are asking to appear online or are skipping hearings altogether.
Meanwhile, ambitious managers are publicly upbraiding those who raise doubts about the legality of locking up migrants with no criminal record in packed facilities. In a recent town hall with DHS principal legal adviser Charles Wall, several lawyers complained about the pressure, confusing orders and lack of resources, according to notes from the meeting shared with AP.
Wall said the pace is likely to continue for years, the notes say. When one federal employee asked about bringing firearms to work for fear of harassment by activists inside courthouses, Wall said that judges should not hesitate to kick out the public. Wall could not be reached for comment.
‘I want to go back to my country’
The harsh tactics have had one effect the administration wants: Voluntary migrant departures have soared, with more than 14,000 people seeking court permission to self-deport in the first eight months of 2025, according to federal data collected by data-gtm-enhancement-style="LinkEnhancementA" href="https://www.mobilepathways.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mobile Pathways, a San Francisco-based nonprofit that pushes for transparency in migration proceedings. That is more than the previous five years combined. The number is almost certainly an undercount because most migrants do not withdraw their asylum claim before self-deporting.
At immigration court in Tacoma, Washington, the detainees came up one after the other with the same plea.
“I want to go back to my country,” a Venezuelan man told Judge Theresa Scala.
“I want to leave the country,” said a man from Mexico.
Immigrants know what they face: detention centers with ominous names — “Alligator Alcatraz,” “Louisiana Lockup” and “Speedway Slammer” — as well as workplace raids and neighborhood dragnets.
>
data-expand="ReadMore-expand" data-limit="110" data-main->
Federal agents escort handcuffed detainees after arresting them during a regular check-in with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Wednesday, June 4, 2025, in New York. (AP Photo/Olga Fedorova)
